Harvey Weinstein

Mentioned 2 times across 2 podcasts this week

This Week's Pulse

A New York judge declared a mistrial in the rape retrial of Harvey Weinstein on May 15, 2026, after jurors reported they were deadlocked. Reports later surfaced that nine of the 12 jurors had voted to acquit.

Podcast hosts are picking through the wreckage of the proceedings to discuss broader themes of credibility and industry complicity. On The Megyn Kelly Show, legal analyst Mark Geragos pointed to the trial as a practical case study for jury instructions, noting, "I was watching the closing argument in Harvey Weinstein's third trial here in New York in the Manhattan Court."

Meanwhile, others are looking past the courtroom mechanics to the cultural environment that sustained him. On The Tucker Carlson Show, Sean Stone framed the producer as the embodiment of a corrupt Hollywood system, stating, "There's debauchery. I mean, you know, it's like everyone knew Harvey Weinstein-"

Legal observers and cultural critics are currently bracing for a June 24, 2026, hearing where prosecutors will decide whether to move forward with a fourth trial. The tension remains high as the legal system grapples with the fallout of a deadlocked jury.

Where it's discussed

Ex-Freemason: Possessed Politicians, Demonic Rituals for Power, Secret Societies, and the Occult

The Tucker Carlson Show

Sean Stonenegativefrom “Ritual, Media, and Hollywood Occultism

Described as a monster in both business and personal conduct who was widely accepted in Hollywood.

There's debauchery. I mean, you know, it's like everyone knew Harvey Weinstein-

The TRUTH About Michael Jackson as Biopic Sets Records, and Blake Lively's DOOMED Legal Strategy, with Mark Geragos and Matt Murphy

The Megyn Kelly Show

Mark Geragosneutralfrom “Legal and Credibility Analysis of Leaving Neverland

Mentioned by Mark Geragos in the context of a recent trial and jury instructions regarding witness credibility.

By the way, if you're in a jury trial and this happened, say, say that this kind of manipulation happened, you would get a jury instruction that says, "A witness who is willfully false in a material part of the, of his testimony, he or she can be and should be